WmInce

53 minutes ago, ShawnM said:

LOL, that's funny. Sleep IS overrated, right? 

Some of my “best work,” is done after hours. . .

7 hours ago, Skipper said:

Shawn, do you ever sleep? 😁

Life is short . . . stay awake for it!

*Brought to you by the makers of Caribou Coffee. 😃

You do a great job here, Dave, thank you. 😊

Wow!

Membership has almost doubled, just since I have been here . . . and I’m a newbie.

Hope it keeps growing and we get more participation.

And we are happy to have you here.

Welcome to the forum, Johnathan. . . . 😊

GREAT!

Still climbing.

7 hours ago, Roger Lee said:

. . . For some this isn't a good thing. Then planes get poor maint., have things done that shouldn't, things not be done and just poor over all maint. Some can handle this responsibility and some can't. There is common sense and responsibility that goes with this and some do a poor job.

That comes from a professional mechanic. And I might add, a damn good one at that.

This is the reason why some people, especially first time buyers, won't even consider looking at an "Experimental." That is a fact.

 I was in that camp myself and know plenty of others who felt the same way. It stems from fear. Fear of bad maintenance, poor build quality and in general, just getting burned. There is some history to each one of those scenarios.

That is why I have always had the opinion, and still do, that going "experimental," does have the drawback of reducing the market for the airplane, even if it is perfectly sound. Some people just won't bite.

That withstanding, if one is diligent, properly informed, does their homework and has some professional help, I see nothing wrong with the purchase of an experimental. There are some fine ones out there, for sure. In some cases, they are better built and more well equipped than production aircraft.

Congratulations on your new airplane ttabs.

Have fun and keep it safe!

Sounds like debris in the carburetors.

Suggest you drop the bowls and inspect for foreign objects. Very simple to do. See the YouTube video on how to do that.

If carbs are free of debris, then perhaps they need to be resynchronized. There is a Rotax video on that also.

7 hours ago, Izzy said:

Don't worry Bill! I can't even a sarcastic laugh after a simple knock knock joke....at least you continue trying, kudos for that, I gave up years ago and just switched over to mean sarcasm which suits me well!

3 hours ago, ShawnM said:

Izzy, I think Bill (WmInce) was making a joke (hence the emoji) that one should be more happy to see a 6'-1" blonde with all her sexy features than Kirk from Dynon.

Correct.

My feeble attempt at a little humor failed miserably.

i just hate that about me. 

3 hours ago, Izzy said:

Well first things first . . . . . But, then again I heard that we will be having an SC owners that is a "6'-1" blonde swimsuit model with long legs, sexy eyes, firm butt and 36D boobs looking for my sugar daddy with a nice plane"....Now that may be worth the trip!

Izzy

3 hours ago, ronin5573 said:

Is Dynon still coming. I think they finally got the 472 adsb dual band  unit fixed.  Ask them when they should start shipping. 

Wow! . . . . somebody really needs to re-arrange their priorities. 

15 hours ago, Hwick2000 said:

I do not have a BRS, but that is an option. When I bought the plane it was ordered by another buyer that backed out at the last minute ( reason I got a Fantastic deal). The empty weight is 792 lbs.  

For a Bristell, that empty weight is actually pretty good.

Throw in BRS and fuel injection and that makes a big difference in weight. Think fuel.

I love the Bristell. 51 inches of shoulder room can't be beat, by any other LSA. My CT has is close, with 49 inches.

45 minutes ago, Hwick2000 said:

. . . . . we decided on the Bristell because we got a fantastic deal on a fantastic plane.

Is your Bristell equipped with a BRS?

Can you share with us the published "empty weight" of your airplane?

Some of us may want to buy one.

40 minutes ago, ShawnM said:

To quote Lou from his email:

BRM Aero, Milan Bristela routinely supplies an LOA in about one week..

Again, that does not sound right. Regardsing S-LSA, there has to be fleet accountability.

In the above scenario, who submits the LOA, and who is the receiver of the LOA?

Once an alteration is initially installed by BRM, how does the factory track which S-LSA's, in their fleet, have which alterations?

If no accurate (and up to date) records are tracked, on individual airframes, how would the NTSB determine, if an S-LSA had proper and approved equipment installed, during an accident investigation?

3 hours ago, Deltafox said:

. . . I believe the GDL82 would be a great low-cost solution for your aircraft. . . . 

And so would uAvionix echoUAT+SkyFYX-EXT.

Thus far, that is my first choice. Will probably install this year.

On 10/20/2016 at 4:30 PM, ShawnM said:

. . . you dont need an LOA if the new part you want to install is already in newer planes and included in the IPC and maintenance manual. This means these new parts have already been approved by the manufacturer, no LOA needed.

That does not seem right.

LOA's are serial number specific to each airplane in a manufacturers fleet.

If there is a "blanket" LOA, an MRA (Manufacturer Request for Alteration) still has to be submitted for each indvidual airplane. If approved by the manufacturer, then an LOA is issued, with approval and installation instructions/limitations.

Okay Dave.

All good.

Dave,

Thanks for the prompt reply. And also, thanks for all you do for us (Karen too!).

The same vender (Envision Power Services) provides service to the CT Flier Forum (http://ctflier.com/). This forum looks very much like their forum. With a few exceptions.

Over there, they provide the ability to delete posts with a simple "Options" then "delete" button. I just find it odd it is not available to us here.

33 minutes ago, DavidKarenVV said:

. . . EVERYONE can

EDIT

their own existing "OLD" posts, and one way to "Delete" the post is to Edit your old Post so that there is ZERO Material left  in the post   remaining.  

"select all", "cut" (delete) the typing selected, and delete any attached pictures you no longer like (click the little "trash can" Icon on top of the picture list at the bottom of the EDIT area) and 

EVERYTHING -- all typing and images and links, etc., in that post can be simply removed by the original SCFLIER who generated the post.   

This takes a few more clicks, but it removes the essence of a prior post.  

Same effect as a "one click Delete".

The above is not true, at least, that has been my experience.

After following your directions, when I attempt to delete text in a previous post I made, I am presented with a dialog box that says,

"You can't submit empty content here. Please enter some content and try again."

That is contrary to what you stated above.

Don't know if it will be included, but sure would like to see the ability to delete our own posts.

44 minutes ago, ShawnM said:

If I got this now you dont even own a SportCruiser but at CT. I'll bet you have 3 LOA's because there are not from CSA but CT. I hear they actually listen and take care of their owners. 

Care to confirm this?

Correct Shawn, on both of your assertions.

3 LOA's;  Dynon Skyview D-700's, Matco brakes + wheels, and an Artex ELT.

Flight Design has been really good in working with us. Very reasonable and very prompt.

After submitting MRA's (manufacture request for alteration), the LOA's were approved and sent back in a week.

So far for me, support has been good.

22 minutes ago, ShawnM said:

You'd have to come over to the dark side Wmlnce.... and someone once told me it'll narrow your buyers pool , not to mention kill your resale value. 

Not so.

I already have 3 LOA's, with my S-LSA.

Whoever passed that on to you must have been pretty wise, eh?

You won't know how true that claim is . . . until you sell your aircraft.

Seriously, good luck with that.

9 minutes ago, ShawnM said:

Yes Wmlnce, the US aviation and obstacle data is free courtesy of Dynon. I was referring to the chart data subscription from Seattle Avionics. We're on the same page here.  

I also agree that a second GPS is overkill (and more clutter) when just about all of us travel with a phone and a tablet with foreflight. 

One upgrade I wouldn't mind having though, is replacing my G396 with the Garmin Aera 660. That''s a great little unit that fits nicely in the same spot where the G396 sits. It seems like it is just a smaller version of the G796, at about half the cost.

All that withstanding, the only thing I really use my G396 for is backup GPS position and a constant page displaying NST airports. It works very well.